Contact Info
How does business process consulting help an Italian company?
Business process consulting helps an Italian company see how orders, deliveries, invoices, collections and the close actually move between people, then agree a better flow before buying software. In Italy that means treating SdI notifications, Ri.Ba. presentations and unpaid returns, delivery notes and digital preservation as process steps with named owners, and agreeing handoffs with the commercialista. I do this remotely and independently.
Last reviewed by Vikas Saroj
Italian electronic invoicing changed the tools years ago, but in many companies the process around it never quite settled. A rejection notice from the exchange system lands in a mailbox nobody reads daily. A bank receipt collection comes back unpaid and the sales agent hears about it weeks later. Preservation is assumed to be someone else's job. Each gap is small, and together they cost cash and calm.
Working remotely, I help Italian manufacturers, distributors and service firms trace how work really moves today and agree how it should move tomorrow. Each step gets an owner, a trigger and a rule. Software comes afterward: once the process is clear, it becomes the brief for your current gestionale, a new ERP or a few simple changes.
No software house, vendor or partner pays me anything, so the maps describe your business and not somebody's product. The engagement runs in English, and the Italian text of each procedure is drafted or reviewed by people in your company or a partner you appoint in Italy.
The work describes your business first, so it holds up whichever system you run today or choose later.
Swimlane maps drawn live in online workshops with the people who enter orders, ship goods, issue invoices and chase payments, including the spreadsheets and phone calls that keep things moving.
I map how delivery notes become invoices, whether immediately or grouped later, who checks prices and quantities first and what happens when a delivery note is wrong or a return comes back.
Delivery receipts, rejections and failed deliveries from the SdI each get a defined reaction: who sees them, how quickly, how a rejected invoice is corrected and who confirms it went through.
The Ri.Ba. cycle mapped from due-date planning to presentation, credit and unpaid returns, with clear steps for informing sales, agents and the customer and deciding whether to present again.
Where every purchase and discount still waits for the owner, I help define approval limits by amount and area so routine decisions move without losing control of the important ones.
What goes to the commercialista and the labor consultant, in what form and by whom, written down so the monthly and yearly routines stop depending on reminders and personal memory.
Follow real documents end to end
Agree owners, rules and limits
Leave a process people follow
In many Italian companies each department works well on its own. Sales knows its customers and agents, the warehouse knows its shelves, administration knows the invoices. The trouble sits in the handoffs. A price agreed by an agent never reaches the order. A delivery note leaves with the goods but the invoice waits until month-end, and nobody checks whether quantities changed. A supplier invoice arrives through the exchange system before the goods do, and the person who could match it is on the road.
Owner-led firms add a second pattern: decisions that flow through one person. Purchases, discounts, credit for a slow payer and even small supplier changes wait for the owner's yes. That keeps control, but it also creates a queue that grows with the business.
I start by following real documents through the company rather than asking how things are supposed to work. A recent order, its delivery note, the invoice, the collection and the posting in the books tell a precise story. In online workshops I draw that story as a swimlane map, with every wait, re-entry and workaround marked. The method behind this is on my ERP process mapping page, and it works whether or not a new system is planned.
Electronic invoicing in Italy runs through the national exchange system, and every invoice produces responses: a delivery receipt, a rejection, or a notice that the file could not be delivered and is available in the recipient's reserved area. Systems display these messages, but a process decides what happens next.
In the order-to-cash design I agree with you:
Delivery notes deserve the same attention. Where goods ship with a delivery note and invoices follow later, the process needs a clear point where someone checks that every delivery note has been invoiced, and that returns and price changes were applied. I mark that control on the map with its owner. Timing rules are your commercialista's to state; the map simply guarantees a step exists that applies them.
Bank receipt collections remain part of how many Italian companies get paid, and the process around them is longer than it looks. I map it from the moment payment terms are agreed with the customer to the day the money is safely in the bank:
The weak points are usually the final steps. An unpaid return is booked correctly, but the agent keeps selling to the same customer, or the commission statement goes out unchanged. Clear owners and a short rule for each case fix much of this without any software.
The same map covers SEPA direct debits and bank transfers, so administration works from one view of how each customer pays. Credit decisions, such as blocking further orders, stay with a named person and follow limits management sets.
On the purchasing side, Italian companies receive supplier invoices as structured files through the exchange system, often before the goods are checked in. The procure-to-pay map has to answer what happens in that gap. Who matches the invoice to the order and the receipt? What happens if quantities differ or the price is wrong? Since an invoice cannot simply be sent back the way paper once was, the process needs a route for asking the supplier for a credit note and tracking it until it arrives.
Digital preservation belongs on the same map. Invoices and other documents must be preserved under the applicable rules, often through a provider or with the commercialista's help. In many firms nobody actually checks that every file reached preservation. I add that check as a periodic step with an owner, and leave the legal requirements to your advisor.
Approval limits complete this part. I help you write a simple matrix: who may order, approve an invoice difference or authorize a payment, by amount and area, with the owner keeping the decisions that genuinely matter. Approval design in more depth is on my approval workflows page, and the requirement side is covered by my Italian ERP business analyst work.
Most Italian companies rely on outside advisors: a commercialista for tax and statutory books, a labor consultant for payroll. The record-to-report and hire-to-pay maps show exactly what flows to and from them. Which reconciliations does administration finish first? Which reports does the commercialista expect for the periodic VAT settlement? How do hires, leavers, absences and overtime reach the labor consultant, and how does the payroll journal come back into the books? When these handoffs are written down, they stop depending on phone calls in the last days of the month.
Personal data travels through these flows, especially in hire to pay. I mark on each map which personal details pass to which advisor, giving your privacy counsel a concrete basis for a GDPR review. The legal conclusions are theirs to draw.
Only then does software return to the conversation. Sometimes the current gestionale can support the agreed process with better setup. Sometimes a new system is needed, and the maps become the brief described on my ERP consultant page for Italy. Repetitive steps the maps uncover lead into my Italian business automation work. Everything I offer Italian firms is listed on the Italy overview.
Tell me about your business and current systems. I’ll suggest the most sensible first step.
Book a Consultation
Not sure which ERP you need?
Share your business requirements with me and I will help you understand the right process, architecture and platform before implementation.
Because the software sends the invoice but does not decide who reacts to a rejection, how a failed delivery is communicated or who checks that every delivery note was invoiced. Those are process questions. Mapping them gives each step an owner and a rule, which often removes delays without changing the system at all.
No. Tax treatment, invoicing timing and preservation obligations are questions for your commercialista or tax advisor. I design the process so the business has clear steps that follow their guidance, and I write their answers into procedures so they are applied consistently rather than remembered by one person.
Yes, if the owner wants it to. I document which decisions currently need the owner, then propose approval limits by amount and area. The owner decides which decisions to keep and which to delegate. The result is a written matrix that keeps control over what matters while routine items move faster.
Where you agree, yes. I ask the commercialista a short list of questions about the documents, reconciliations and reports they need, and their timing preferences, then build those answers into the record-to-report map. They keep responsibility for tax and statutory matters; the map simply makes the handoff predictable.
You can use them on their own to retrain staff and tidy procedures, or as the starting point for automation, a better setup of your current system or a new ERP selection. The maps, issue log, approval matrix and procedures stay with you in editable formats.
Every business is different. Share where you are today and what you want to fix, and I’ll tell you honestly whether and how I can help.
Book a Consultation
Book a consultation to talk through your processes, systems and goals. I’ll reply with practical next steps - no obligation.